Lens details
| Mounts | Canon EF |
| Lensname | Canon EF 17-40 F/4L USM |
| Focallength | 17 - 40 mm |
| Speed | F/4 |
| Stabilisation | 0 stops |
| Min. focusdistance | 28 cm |
| Size | 83.5 x 96.8 mm |
| Weight | 475 grams |
| Filtersize | 77 mm |
| Autofocus | USM |
| Aperture blades | 7 blades |
| Minimal aperture | F/22 |
| Elements / groups | 12 / 9 |
| Magnification | 0.24 |
| Hood | EW-83E, supplied |
| F-stop breakdown | N/A |
| Other info | Weathersealed when filter is used. |
Sponsored links
External reviews
| 16-9.net - Sig 12-24 v Sig 15-30 v Canon 17-40L |
| Fredmiranda |
| Luminous Landscape |
| Pbase |
| Photozone |
| SLRgear |
| The Digital Picture |
| William Castleman |
Grades
| Overall | 9,3 |
| Performance | 8,7 |
| Build | 10,0 |
| Price | 8,3 |
Reviews for the Canon EF 17-40 F/4L USM
Register here to add your own review| Pro: | - Contrast
|
| Con: | - It isn't as sharp wide-open on 40mm as I had hoped, but it is excellent when stopped down a little.
|
| Review: | I bought this lens as my main walkaround lens for the 30D, and it has been everything I hoped it would be. The only disappointing thing is what I knew in advance, the sharpness wide-open near 40mm. It's still very good, but this lens has such good reviews, I was expecting even more. But from f/5.6 it is much sharper than de sensor can handle, so I wouldn't worry about it. If you need low light capability I'd recommend the 16-35, but if you don't need that (or don't want to spend the money), get this one. Also this lens is much better against flare.
|
| Build quality | Performance | Price rating | Overall | Recommended? |
| 10 | 9 | 8 | 9 | Yes |
| Pro: | Sharp
|
| Con: | Kinda soft at 24mm and 40mm
|
| Review: | Very nice walk-around lens on 1.6x cropfactor bodies. Very well constructed, handles flare well for a wide-angle lens.
|
| Build quality | Performance | Price rating | Overall | Recommended? |
| 10 | 8 | 7 | 9 | Yes |
| Pro: | Lightweight, blazingly fast autofocus, sharp, great contrast, little flare, L-build, very wel dampened focusring, smooth zoomring |
| Con: | Could be a bit sharper though |
| Review: | Although I think it could be a bit sharper (hence the 9 at performance) it is a great lens. It's AF is just about the fastest you'll find at this moment, the range is the same as an 24-70 at fullframe which makes it a rather nice standardzoom.
|
| Build quality | Performance | Price rating | Overall | Recommended? |
| 10 | 9 | 10 | 10 | Yes |