Lens details
| Mounts | Canon EF |
| Lensname | Canon EF 70-200 F/4L USM |
| Focallength | 70 - 200 mm |
| Speed | F/4 |
| Stabilisation | 0 stops |
| Min. focusdistance | 120 cm |
| Size | 76 x 172 mm |
| Weight | 705 grams |
| Filtersize | 67 mm |
| Autofocus | USM |
| Aperture blades | 8 blades |
| Minimal aperture | F/32 |
| Elements / groups | 16 / 13 |
| Magnification | 0.21 |
| Hood | ET-74, supplied |
| F-stop breakdown | N/A |
| Other info | Tripod Mount Ring A, not supplied. |
Sponsored links
External reviews
| Fredmiranda |
| Pbase |
| Photozone |
| SLRgear |
| The Digital Picture |
Grades
| Overall | 8,7 |
| Performance | 9,2 |
| Build | 9,0 |
| Price | 8,0 |
Product photo
Reviews for the Canon EF 70-200 F/4L USM
Register here to add your own review| Pro: | Excellent build quality, mine came including a superb lens hood. The lens does not extend during zooming, so one fixed length. Lightweigt, metal body.
|
| Con: | Why is it white ? I'm not working in a hospital, all those blood stains on the lens body will disturb me after a while I think.
|
| Review: | Got mine a week now. Did some shooting in the Port of Rotterdam on Easter. Most pictures taken are good enough to keep. Very sharp and in daylight allmost allways enough light to shoot at 200mm with f/6.3 ~ f 7.1 with shutter speed of max 1/200 or less.
|
| Build quality | Performance | Price rating | Overall | Recommended? |
| 9 | 9 | 10 | 9 | Yes |
| Pro: | - Sharp wide-open, but better closed down
|
| Con: | - No stabalizer
|
| Review: | This lens is very affordable if you want a reasonably fast medium telezoom with stunning performance. It is 'only' a F/4-lens but you don't have to stop down to get excellent performance. And not only the sharpness is excellent, also the bokeh, contrast and the colours.
|
| Build quality | Performance | Price rating | Overall | Recommended? |
| 10 | 9 | 9 | 9 | Yes |
| Pro: | Fast focus
|
| Con: | Cost does not include tripod mount
|
| Review: | My main criticism of this lens is that it does not seem an extremely useful range for what I shoot. Many images I have taken with it are at the full 200mm so I suspect I might have prefered the similarly priced 200mm f/2.8 prime. It is a good lens and works well with extension tubes as a macro substitute. |
| Build quality | Performance | Price rating | Overall | Recommended? |
| 9 | 9 | 7 | 8 | 0 |
| Pro: | - Fast AF
|
| Con: | - White
|
| Review: | I bought this lens yesterday. It really statisfies me. The AF is quick and silent. It's very sharp. The built quality is very good, it feels very solid.
|
| Build quality | Performance | Price rating | Overall | Recommended? |
| 9 | 9 | 7 | 9 | Yes |
| Pro: | + White
|
| Con: | - No weather sealing
|
| Review: | The Canon EF 70-200/4L USM is one of the best affordable L lenses. De L series stands for quality and one can see that on different points of this lens.
|
| Build quality | Performance | Price rating | Overall | Recommended? |
| 8 | 9 | 7 | 8 | Yes |